Short Communication
Print
Short Communication
Tetraploid European paeonies (Paeonia) show a homogeneous karyotype asymmetry and structure
expand article infoLorenzo Peruzzi, Jacopo Franzoni, Antonio Giacò, Emanuela Abidi, Emiliano Alù, Giulio Barone§, Elisabetta Bianchi|, Chiara Cataudella, Emanuela Di Iorio, Maria Guerrina#, Fabio Mondello¤, Luca Paino, Mario Pentassuglia, Manuela Porrovecchio«, Giovanni Rivieccio», Eugenia Siccardi|, Adriano Stinca˄, Alessio Tei, Virginia Volanti|, Manuel Tiburtini
‡ University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
§ Forest and Food Sciences University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy
¶ University of Napoli "Federico II", Napoli, Italy
# University of Genova, Genova, Italy
¤ University of Messina, Messina, Italy
« University of Catania, Catania, Italy
» University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
˄ University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Caserta, Italy
Open Access

Abstract

Within a practical course of cytotaxonomy organized in Pisa (Italy) on February 2024 by the Group for Floristics, Systematics and Evolution of the Italian Botanical Society, we tested whether relevant differences in karyotype asymmetry and structure occur in four tetraploid European taxa from Paeonia sect. Paeonia (P. mascula subsp. russoi, P. officinalis subsp. huthii, P. officinalis subsp. italica, and P. peregrina). Our results point towards a homogeneous karyotype asymmetry and structure among studied tetraploid species, with no statistically significant difference among taxa and high overlap in variation highlighted by PCA.

Keywords

Cytogenetics, cytostematics, cytotaxonomy

Introduction

The Boreal genus Paeonia is the only member of the family Paeoniaceae (Saxifragales) and includes ca. 40 species (Tamura 2007). It consists of three monophyletic sections: P. sect. Paeonia (which includes most herbaceous species, from Eurasia), P. sect. Moutan DC. (including woody species endemic to western China), and P. sect. Oanepia Lindl. (including herbaceous species from North America) (Sang et al. 1997). The basic chromosome number of this genus is x = 5, which is most likely ancestral (Carta et al. 2020). Three ploidy levels have been documented: diploids (2n = 10, found in all sections), tetraploids (2n = 20, found only in P. sect. Paeonia) and (mostly artificial) hybrid triploids with 2n = 15 chromosomes (Hong et al. 1988; Yang et al. 2017).

Due to the large chromosomes (10–15 µm long; Okada and Tamura 1979) as compared to other angiosperms (Badr and El-Shazly 2021), this genus is an ideal model to practice with karyomorphology, which is a simple, inexpensive and powerful approach to obtain useful basic comparative information in systematic studies (Astuti et al. 2017). This approach typically involves measuring chromosomes (i.e. length of long arm [L], short arm [S]) in spread metaphase plates to describe the phenotypic aspect of a chromosome complement (Levin 2002; Guerra 2012).

Metaphase plates of selected Paeonia taxa were utilized during a practical course on cytotaxonomy organized in Pisa (Italy) between February 6 and 9, 2024 by the Group for Floristics, Systematics and Evolution of the Italian Botanical Society. The main objective was to test whether relevant differences in karyotype asymmetry and structure could be identified in selected tetraploid European taxa from P. sect. Paeonia. Commonly used traits for this analysis included total haploid (monoploid) chromosome length (THL), the mean centromeric asymmetry (MCA), the coefficient of variation of chromosome length (CVCL), and the coefficient of variation of centromeric index (CVCI) (Peruzzi and Altınordu 2014).

Materials and methods

One of the authors (LP) prepared a set of permanent microscope slides about twenty years ago (between 2002 and 2005), as part of a study on Italian Paeonia species, whose results were only partially published concerning the sole chromosome numbers (L. Peruzzi in Passalacqua and Bernardo 2004).

Squash preparations were made on root tips obtained from plants temporarily cultivated in pots at the Botanical Garden of the Calabria University, Arcavacata di Rende, Cosenza (Table 1). Root tips were pre-treated with 0.4% colchicine for 3 hours and then fixed in Carnoy solution for 1 hour. After hydrolysis in 1N HCl at 60 °C for 7.5 minutes, the tips were stained with leuco-basic fuchsine.

Table 1.

Source of the tetraploid (2n = 4x = 20) Paeonia taxa studied, and the number of studied metaphase plate microphotographs.

Locality, date, and collector(s) metaphase plates (N)
Paeonia mascula (L.) Mill. subsp. russoi (Biv.) Cullen & Heywood Italy, Sicily, Iblei (Valle Cava Grande), 10 July 2003, L. Peruzzi et N.G. Passalacqua 2
Paeonia officinalis L. subsp. huthii Soldano Italy, Liguria (Monte Toraggio), 19 June 1995, L. Bernardo et N.G. Passalacqua 4
Paeonia officinalis L. subsp. italica N.G.Passal. & Bernardo Italy, Abruzzo, Gran Sasso (Prati di Tivo), 13 July 2001, L. Bernardo et N.G. Passalacqua 5
Paeonia peregrina Mill. Bulgaria, 1 August 2001, D. Uzunov 3

A total of 14 metaphase plates (Table 1) were analyzed by the course participants using MATO software (Altınordu et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2023). The focus was on the following quantitative traits:

  • THL (total haploid [monoploid] length of chromosome complement): a proxy of genome size (Carta and Peruzzi 2016; Franzoni et al. 2024) calculated as the sum of the length of all the chromosomes in a metaphase plate, divided by the ploidy level (Peruzzi and Altınordu 2014);
  • M CA (mean centromeric asymmetry): intrachromosomal karyotype asymmetry (Peruzzi and Eroğlu 2013) calculated as the mean value of the difference between the two (complementary) proportions L/(L+S) and S/(L+S), multiplied by 100;
  • CV CL (coefficient of variation of chromosome length): interchromosomal karyotype asymmetry (Paszko 2006) calculated as the standard deviation of chromosome lengths (L+S) in a complement, divided by the mean chromosome length and multiplied by 100;
  • CV CI (coefficient of variation of centromeric index): degree of heterogeneity in the position of centromere in a karyotype (Zuo and Yuan 2011) calculated as the standard deviation of centromeric index S/(L+S) in a complement, divided by the mean centromeric index and multiplied by 100 (Paszko 2006).

To test for differences among taxa, univariate (non-parametric Mann-Whitney pairwise test) and multivariate (PCA, after logarithmic standardization) statistics have been conducted in PAST 4.17 (Hammer et al. 2001; Hammer 2024).

Results

All taxa studied had 2n = 4x = 20 chromosomes. The variation of each karyomorphological trait is presented in Table 2.

Table 2.

Karyomorphological traits calculated by the participants for selected tetraploid European Paeonia taxa.

Metaphase plate 2n x THL (µm) MCA CVCL CVCI
Paeonia mascula subsp. russoi 1 20 5 112.38 35.02 19.26 23.26
Paeonia mascula subsp. russoi 2 20 5 116.63 32.44 24.54 23.04
Paeonia officinalis subsp. huthii 1 20 5 116.58 28.40 25.02 27.30
Paeonia officinalis subsp. huthii 2 20 5 103.27 22.43 14.06 20.06
Paeonia officinalis subsp. huthii 3 20 5 126.55 17.37 18.85 20.89
Paeonia officinalis subsp. huthii 4 20 5 103.73 26.71 14.79 23.87
Paeonia officinalis subsp. italica 1 20 5 126.36 23.12 17.24 27.39
Paeonia officinalis subsp. italica 2 20 5 101.14 24.55 21.25 22.24
Paeonia officinalis subsp. italica 3 20 5 114.59 22.18 22.34 20.18
Paeonia officinalis subsp. italica 4 20 5 117.54 26.35 15.01 21.22
Paeonia officinalis subsp. italica 5 20 5 93.41 32.02 21.47 24.04
Paeonia peregrina 1 20 5 106.36 28.25 16.14 26.01
Paeonia peregrina 2 20 5 100.33 30.50 21.29 21.74
Paeonia peregrina 3 20 5 122.11 29.48 18.06 25.27

According to univariate statistics, no significant differences were observed among the four studied taxa, for any of the considered karyomorphological parameters. The PCA (Fig. 1), whose first two components account for 85% of variation, show overlap among groups, although higher CVCI and CVCL values slightly separated the two accessions of P. mascula subsp. russoi from the others.

Figure 1. 

PCA illustrating the overall variation of karyomorphological traits in the four studied tetraploid Paeonia taxa. Blue dots: P. mascula subsp. russoi; black dots: P. officinalis subsp. huthii, black empty squares: P. officinalis subsp. italica; Red dots: P. peregrina.

Discussion

The chromosome number for Italian P. mascula subsp. russoi, P. officinalis subsp. huthii, and P. officinalis subsp. italica were already reported in Passalacqua and Bernardo (2004), while the count for P. peregrina from Bulgaria was not published before, but agrees with data published by Koeva and Sarkova (1997).

Regarding karyomorphological traits, our results suggest homogeneous karyotype asymmetry and structure among the studied tetraploid Paeonia species, with no statistically significant differences between taxa and high overlap in variation highlighted by PCA. Despite the very limited sampling, which prevents from any conclusion, the only species somehow distinct is P. mascula, which is also taxonomically more distinct with respect to P. officinalis/P. peregrina (Passalacqua and Bernardo 2004), based on leaf and root structure.

To our knowledge, this is the first quantitative study on this topic. Our findings are consistent with previous qualitative karyological observations of tetraploid Paeonia taxa from Europe (Tzanoudakis 1983; Schwarzacher-Robinson 1986; Punina 2005). This homogeneity seems even more extensive and possibly applying to large portions of P. sect. Paeonia. Indeed, for instance, CVCL and CVCI values calculated in the studied taxa are very similar to those reported for the tetraploid P. mairei H.Lév., endemic to China (Chen et al. 2023).

The similarity in karyotype structure in such tetraploids can hinder the possibility to highlight their allotetraploid status (see, e.g., Sang et al. 2004; Punina et al. 2021) using traditional Feulgen approaches. However, molecular cytogenetic techniques like GISH have been effective in cultivated hybrid varieties (Cui et al. 2022), and could be valuable in studying wild species.

References

  • Altınordu F, Peruzzi L, Yu Y, He X (2016) A tool for the analysis of chromosomes: KaryoType. Taxon 65(3): 586–592. https://doi.org/10.12705/653.9
  • Astuti G, Roma-Marzio F, Peruzzi L (2017) Traditional cytotaxonomic studies: can they still provide a solid basis in plant systematics? Flora Mediterranea 27: 91–98. https://doi.org/10.7320/FlMedit27.091
  • Carta A, Bedini G, Peruzzi L (2020) A deep dive into the ancestral chromosome number and genome size of flowering plants. New Phytologist 228: 1097–1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13769
  • Carta A, Peruzzi L (2016) Testing the large genome constraint hypothesis: plant traits, habitat and climate seasonality in Liliaceae. New Phytologist 210(2): 709–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13769
  • Chen L, Chen Q, Fan Y, Xu Y, Wu B, Xu L, Teixeira da Silva JA, Yu X (2023) Ploidy and karyotype analysis of different populations of Paeonia mairei, an endemic species to China. Cytologia 88(1): 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.88.55
  • Cui L, Chen T, Zhao X, Wang S, Ren X, Xue J, Zhang X (2022) Karyotype analysis, genomic and fluorescence in situ hybridization (GISH and FISH) reveal the ploidy and parental origin of chromosomes in Paeonia Itoh hybrids. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23(19): 11406. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911406
  • Franzoni J, Astuti G, Bacchetta G, Barone G, Bartolucci F, Bernardo L, Carta A, Conti F, Domina G, Frajman B, Giusso del Galdo G, Iamonico D, Iberite M, Minuto L, Sarigu M, Terlević A, Turini A, Varaldo L, Volgger D, Peruzzi L (2024) A cytosystematic study of the Dianthus virgineus complex (Caryophyllaceae) in the Central Mediterranean. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 62(4): 589–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.13025
  • Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontologia Electronica 4(1): 1–9.
  • Hong D-Y, Zhang Z-X, Zhu X-Y (1988) Studies on the genus Paeonia, 1. Report of karyotypes of some wild species in China. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 26: 33–43.
  • Koeva J, Sarkova S (1997) Karyological study of three species of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae) in Bulgaria. Bocconea 5: 553–556.
  • Okada H, Tamura M (1979) Karyomorphology and relationship on the Ranunculaceae. Journal of Japanese Botany 54: 65–77.
  • Punina EO (2005) Paeonia officinalis (Paeoniaceae), a new species to the flora of the Caucasus and Russia, and its karyosystematic investigation. Botaniceskii Zhurnal (Moscow & Leningrad) 90(2): 267–274.
  • Punina EO, Machs EM, Krapivskaya EE, Kim ES, Mordak EV, Myakoshina YA, Rodionov AV (2012) Interspecific hybridization in the genus Paeonia (Paeoniaceae): polymorphic sites in transcribed spacers of the 45S rRNA genes as indicators of natural and artificial peony hybrids. Russian Journal of Genetics 48: 684–697. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795412070113
  • Sang T, Crawford DJ, Stuessy T (1997) Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 84(8): 1120–1136. https://doi.org/10.2307/2446155
  • Sang T, Pan J, Zhang D, Ferguson D, Wang C, Pan K-Y, Hong D-Y (2004) Origins of polyploids: an example from peonies (Paeonia) and a model for angiosperms. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82(4): 561–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00341.x
  • Schwarzacher-Robinson T (1986) Meiosis, SC-formation and karyotype structure in diploid Paeonia tenuifolia and tetraploid P. officinalis. Plant Systematics and Evolution 154: 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990128
  • Tamura M (2007) Paeoniaceae: In: Kubitzki K (Ed.) The Families and Genera of Flowering Plants, Vol. 9: 265–269. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
  • Zuo J, Yuan G (2011) The difference between the heterogeneity of the centromeric index and intrachromosomal asymmetry. Plant Systematics and Evolution 297: 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-011-0528-x
login to comment