<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "https://italianbotanist.pensoft.net/nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">54</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:719A4407-6918-50E6-BCDF-A4165D76DC1E</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">Italian Botanist</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">IB</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2531-4033</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Pensoft Publishers</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/italianbotanist.22.183002</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">183002</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="biological_taxon">
          <subject>Plantae</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>Biodiversity &amp; Conservation</subject>
          <subject>Conservation Biology</subject>
          <subject>Plant and habitat conservation</subject>
          <subject>Vascular Plants</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="geographical_area">
          <subject>Europe</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>An isolated, yet extensive population of the threatened species <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">Jacobaea</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Asteraceae">Asteraceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) shows alarming reproductive constraints</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Barberis</surname>
            <given-names>Marta</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1062-4760</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Buldrini</surname>
            <given-names>Fabrizio</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">fabrizio.buldrini@unimi.it</email>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0376-6760</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Bogo</surname>
            <given-names>Gherardo</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7415-2224</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Severi</surname>
            <given-names>Riccardo</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Galloni</surname>
            <given-names>Marta</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5304-7820</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Department of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 42, 40126 Bologna, Italy</addr-line>
        <institution>Department of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Bologna</addr-line>
        <country>Italy</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/01111rn36</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A2">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Department of Biosciences, University of Milan, Via G. Celoria 26, 20133 Milan, Italy</addr-line>
        <institution>Department of Biosciences, University of Milan</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Milan</addr-line>
        <country>Italy</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/00wjc7c48</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A3">
        <label>3</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">CREA Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Via di Corticella 133, 40128 Bologna, Italy</addr-line>
        <institution>CREA Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Bologna</addr-line>
        <country>Italy</country>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p>Corresponding author: Fabrizio Buldrini (<ext-link xlink:href="mailto:fabrizio.buldrini@unimi.it" ext-link-type="uri">fabrizio.buldrini@unimi.it</ext-link>)</p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="edited-by">
          <p>Academic editor: Juan Arroyo</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>14</day>
        <month>07</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>22</volume>
      <fpage>1</fpage>
      <lpage>16</lpage>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/B8F59BB5-7E5D-52B3-A65B-2B11F8B7E13B">B8F59BB5-7E5D-52B3-A65B-2B11F8B7E13B</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>20</day>
          <month>12</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>14</day>
          <month>04</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Marta Barberis, Fabrizio Buldrini, Gherardo Bogo, Riccardo Severi, Marta Galloni</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <label>Abstract</label>
        <p>In lowlands, many species have been confined into small and isolated populations due to agricultural and industrial development, leading to constraints in generation turnover which may threaten their survival in the long run. Therefore, studies aimed at identifying such constraints must indeed be carried out. The populations of the hydro-hygrophilous <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">Jacobaea</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> are decreasing due to progressive habitat loss, water pollution and eutrophication. In order to assess possible reproductive constraints, in this study we have investigated: (<italic>a</italic>) the species’ self-compatibility and dependency on insect pollination, (<italic>b</italic>) the occurrence of pollination limitation, (<italic>c</italic>) differences in reproductive success between the study population and another population subjected to a reinforcement intervention conducted 10 years earlier. We performed a series of field pollination tests, including spontaneous selfing, natural pollination, hand self-pollination and pollen supplementation, as well as assessing reproductive fitness in terms of fruit production, cypselae vitality and seed germination ability. Other than providing insights into the reproductive ecology of the species, our results showed that supplementing capitula with pollen collected from a distinct population benefited seed germination within the study population. Altogether, these results indicate potential inbreeding depression and highlight the importance of focusing on populations as key units for identifying constraints in generation turnover and for implementing targeted conservation measures, thereby optimising resource allocation.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>Biodiversity conservation</kwd>
        <kwd>embryo vitality</kwd>
        <kwd>germination test</kwd>
        <kwd>hydro-hygrophilous species</kwd>
        <kwd>plant population</kwd>
        <kwd>pollination test</kwd>
        <kwd>reinforcement</kwd>
        <kwd>river corridor plants</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <funding-group>
        <funding-statement>Marta Galloni was partially supported by the Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), Project title “National Biodiversity Future Centre -NBFC”. CUP J33C22001190001</funding-statement>
      </funding-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="Introduction" id="sec1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Land cover alterations are among the greatest human-induced threats to terrestrial biodiversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">IPCC 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">IPBES 2019</xref>). In the last century, Europe has witnessed unprecedented rates of habitat loss and fragmentation, where past and ongoing human activities have transformed the territory into a mosaic of semi-natural habitats and both urban and agricultural environments, where natural habitats are restricted to just a few small areas (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Danihelka et al. 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Wärner et al. 2011</xref>). In contexts such as these, many hydro-hygrophilous species, once common in previous decades, have either become extinct or are currently facing extinction. Among them are there the so-called river corridor plants (<italic>sensu</italic><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Zacharias and Garve 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Burkart 2001</xref> and references therein), i.e. plant species found exclusively or at least predominantly in the valleys of large European rivers, in areas where the ground is periodically subject to inundation and desiccation cycles. Given their naturally fragmented distribution, many of these species are very rare and on the brink of extinction in central Europe (e.g. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Allium">Allium</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="angulosum">angulosum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> L., <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Gratiola">Gratiola</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="officinalis">officinalis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> L., <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Scutellaria">Scutellaria</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="hastifolia">hastifolia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> L., <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Viola">Viola</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="elatior">elatior</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Fries, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Viola">V.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pumila">pumila</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Chaix: see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Metzing et al. 2018</xref>). In the Po Plain (northern Italy) they are on the very edge of their range, geographically isolated from core-range populations. Despite belonging to widely distributed chorotypes (e.g. Eurasian, Eurosiberian, Palaeotemperate), many of these species are currently confined to small, relict and isolated nuclei, often growing in artificial habitats such as drainage canals, quarry basins, man-made wetlands etc., basically their last refuge areas in an otherwise inhospitable territory (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Buldrini et al. 2013a</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2013b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Dorotovičová 2013</xref>). In fact, agricultural and industrial development in the Po plain has left only a few strips of wilderness in its highly anthropogenic matrix (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Dallai et al. 2011</xref>), where intensive crops, industrial areas, urban outskirts and hydraulic regulation nowadays replace the vast marshes and forests of past centuries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Montanari et al. 2020</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2022</xref>).</p>
      <p>The Po Plain populations of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">Jacobaea</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (L.) G.Gaertn., B.Mey. &amp; Scherb. (a river corridor plant) are decreasing rapidly due to progressive habitat destruction and increase in water pollution and eutrophication (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Buldrini et al. 2013c</xref>), which is why the taxon has been included in various regional red lists (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Conti et al. 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Poldini et al. 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Prosser 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Buffa et al. 2016</xref>). On a national scale, the species is not yet included in any official red list, although present in an unofficial (yet scientifically relevant) document (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Conti et al. 1992</xref>). <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">J.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> populations are often fragmented and isolated, separated from the rest of the continental populations by the Alps (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Conti et al. 2005</xref>).</p>
      <p>For conservation purposes, carrying out works aimed at identifying potential constraints in the succession of plant generations is highly encouraged (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Aronne 2017</xref>). At the same time, reinforcement interventions (here intended <italic>sensu</italic><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">IUCN/SSC 2013</xref>: «the intentional movement and release of an organism into an existing population of conspecifics») are performed frequently, especially in the case of small, isolated populations. It is a conservation practice without great impact on the habitat, even if there is the risk of outbreeding depression when recipient populations are small and most of the progenies derive from less adapted translocated individuals. In addition, individuals introduced into an existing population may be subject to a high mortality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">IUCN/SSC 2013</xref>). This is particularly true for species which reproduce mainly by vegetative propagation, given their fine regulation of resource exploitation and micro-habitat colonisation, which is due to the so-called clonal integration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Liu et al. 2016</xref> and references therein).</p>
      <p>In Italy, only few studies on <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">J.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> have dealt with its reproductive fitness (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Dallai et al. 2010</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Buldrini 2012</xref>). Consequently, several aspects of the species’ reproductive ecology are still largely unsubstantiated to this day, therefore making it hard for conservation actions to be implemented at a local scale. Since a population’s long-term survival is guaranteed by maintaining genetic variability and generation turnover (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Aronne 2017</xref>), the aim of this study is to evaluate whether reproduction constraints may limit generation turnover in a natural population and, in doing so, to demonstrate how a conservation-oriented experimental design can rapidly identify such constraints, therefore allowing targeted management interventions. More specifically, in this study we investigated: <italic>a</italic>) the breeding strategy, in particular the species’ ability to self-pollinate and self-fertilise, and its dependency on insect pollination; <italic>b</italic>) the occurrence of pollination limitation within the natural population; <italic>c</italic>) the reproductive fitness of the natural population compared to that of a previously reinforced population.</p>
      <p>Our initial hypotheses were:</p>
      <p>H0: if no differences in fitness were observed, we could assume that, although <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">Jacobaea</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is declining on a national scale, the large populations of the Po Plain have not yet been affected by bottlenecks or other reproductive limitations;</p>
      <p>H1: on the contrary, we should assume that there is a general demographic decline of the populations, even largest ones; therefore, it would be necessary to implement conservation actions such as the general reinforcement of the populations themselves.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
      <title>Materials and methods</title>
      <sec sec-type="Jacobaea paludosa: morphology and ecology" id="sec3">
        <title><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">Jacobaea</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>: morphology and ecology</title>
        <p><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">Jacobaea</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is a perennial rhizomatous helophyte, 50–250 cm tall, with an erect fistulous stem and linear-lanceolate leaves with narrowly toothed margins. The inflorescence is a terminal corymb of capitula with peripheral ligulate bright yellow flowers (only female) and tubulous yellow-brownish flowers (hermaphroditic); the fruit is a cypsela provided with a pappus of whitish hairs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Zàngheri 1976</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Michna 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Pignatti et al. 2017–2019</xref>). Italian populations are currently attributed to the subsp. <italic>paludosa</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Portal to the Flora of Italy 2025</xref>) following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Calvo et al. (2015)</xref>, despite marked morphological variability being frequently observed.</p>
        <p><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">J.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> has a Eurosiberian distribution and lives in marshes, lakes, riparian forests or in sparse <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Phragmites">Phragmites</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="australis">australis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. reed thickets, as well as on river or canal banks and in wet grasslands with peaty soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Michna 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Persico 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Pignatti et al. 2017–2019</xref>). In Italy, it grows in various northern regions, but only in sparse, fragmented and often very small unstable populations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Buldrini 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Pignatti et al. 2017–2019</xref>).</p>
        <p><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">J.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> propagates mainly vegetatively through rhizome fragmentation, while seed recruitment appears to be limited in the wild (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Michna 2006</xref>). Seed viability and germination are highly variable among European populations and tend to be low in small, isolated populations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Walters 1974</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Wells et al. 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Winter et al. 2008</xref>). Similarly to other <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Asteraceae">Asteraceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">J.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> seems to be able to self-pollinate to some degree, however results from previous investigations are contradictory (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Wells et al. 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Michna 2006</xref>); a pollination mediated mostly by insects was suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Klotz et al. (2002)</xref>. In Italy, some preliminary observations showed good pollen vitality (50% minimum) and variable seed fertility (9.3 to ca. 50%, unpublished data), with germination ability dropping to zero after about one year.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Study populations" id="sec4">
        <title>Study populations</title>
        <p>Breeding system and selfing ability were investigated in a natural population located in Piuda, within the protected area SCI-SAC IT20B0017 ‒ Ansa e Valli del Mincio (<named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">45°10'16"N, 10°42'9"E</named-content>, alt. 19 m a.s.l.; hereafter <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> – Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>). There, the population of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">J.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> counts many hundreds of flowering scapes and grows in a humid grassland with peaty soil, extending over approximately 6.8 ha, characterised by <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Molinia">Molinia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="caerulea">caerulea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (L.) Moench, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Carex">Carex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> spp. and various threatened species.</p>
        <fig id="F1">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/italianbotanist.22.183002.figure1</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">584CB2A5-2788-59FC-9F00-5A04A1A40634</object-id>
          <label>Figure 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Location of the study populations. <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> = natural, <abbrev xlink:title="reinforced">REI</abbrev> = reinforced. The red ellipse roughly indicates the distribution area of the species.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="italianbotanist-22-001-g001.jpg" id="oo_1715945.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1715945</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>We also selected a second population, along the right bank of the «Collettore delle Acque Basse Reggiane» canal, within the protected area SCI-SAC IT4030015 ‒ Valli di Novellara (<named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">44°53'15"N, 10°45'32"E</named-content>, alt. 18 m a.s.l.; hereafter <abbrev xlink:title="reinforced">REI</abbrev> – Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>). Here, individuals of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">J.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> form two distinct nuclei, less than 100 m apart, of about 10–15 scapes each; one nucleus is natural, the other derives from a reinforcement intervention performed in 2006, with seeds taken from the first nucleus (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Dallai et al. 2010</xref>).</p>
        <p>Both populations are subject to seasonal water table level fluctuations, with nearly constant soil imbibition and occasional submersion of the basal part of the plants.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Breeding system and selfing ability" id="sec5">
        <title>Breeding system and selfing ability</title>
        <p>To investigate the species’ self-compatibility and ability to self-pollinate without insect pollination and to assess reproductive success in natural conditions, we performed a pollination experiment in the field, both in <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> and in <abbrev xlink:title="reinforced">REI</abbrev>, comparing three tests: <italic>a</italic>) spontaneous self-pollination, where no manipulation was performed on capitula previously bagged with non-woven fabric bags at bud stage (<abbrev xlink:title="spontaneous self-pollination">SS</abbrev>, performed on 6 distinct capitula in <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> and 3 in <abbrev xlink:title="reinforced">REI</abbrev>); <italic>b</italic>) hand self-pollination, where capitula were pollinated manually with pollen from the same individual plant and re-bagged after pollination (<abbrev xlink:title="hand self-pollination">HS</abbrev>, performed on 11 capitula in <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev>); <italic>c</italic>) natural pollination, where no manipulation was performed on marked unbagged capitula, freely accessible to floral visitors (<abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev>, in 2016 performed on 6 distinct capitula in <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> and 4 capitula in <abbrev xlink:title="reinforced">REI</abbrev>, and in 2017 on 12 distinct capitula in <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev>). After withering, all treated capitula were re-bagged to prevent fruit loss or predation. Both <abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="spontaneous self-pollination">SS</abbrev> were performed in <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="reinforced">REI</abbrev> populations, whereas <abbrev xlink:title="hand self-pollination">HS</abbrev> was implemented only in <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> population (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). We point out that separate scapes of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">J.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> may belong to the same genet rather than being distinct individuals, due to predominant vegetative propagation.</p>
        <table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Sample sizes of the embryo vitality and germination ability experiments: number of cypselae tested per class, population, year. The number of experimental scapes is also indicated. <abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev> = natural pollination, <abbrev xlink:title="spontaneous self-pollination">SS</abbrev> = spontaneous self-pollination, <abbrev xlink:title="hand self-pollination">HS</abbrev> = hand self-pollination, <abbrev xlink:title="intra-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-intra</abbrev> = intra-population xenogamous pollination, <abbrev xlink:title="inter-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-inter</abbrev> = inter-population xenogamous pollination. <abbrev xlink:title="reinforced">REI</abbrev> = reinforced population, <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> = natural population, <abbrev xlink:title="cypselae tested for germination the year after collection and test performance">*</abbrev>. Cypselae were categorised per morphological aspect (<abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev>, <abbrev xlink:title="intermediate forms">G2</abbrev>, <abbrev xlink:title="dark coloured">G3</abbrev>, see main text for details).</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Experiment</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Year</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Test</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Population</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>No. of scapes</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>No. of capitula</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>No. of <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev> cypselae tested</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>No. of <abbrev xlink:title="intermediate forms">G2</abbrev> cypselae tested</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>No. of <abbrev xlink:title="dark coloured">G3</abbrev> cypselae tested</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">Embryo vitality</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">2016</td>
                <td rowspan="2" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="reinforced">REI</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">56</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">56</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">15</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">6</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">62</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">37</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">21</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="spontaneous self-pollination">SS</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="reinforced">REI</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">56</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">6</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">6</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">26</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">49</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="7" colspan="1">Germination</td>
                <td rowspan="7" colspan="1">2017</td>
                <td rowspan="2" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="reinforced">REI</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">180*</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">at least 5</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">12</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">135*</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="spontaneous self-pollination">SS</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="reinforced">REI</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="hand self-pollination">HS</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">11</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">82</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="intra-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-intra</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">11</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">135</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="inter-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-inter</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">11</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">135</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>After performing tests, all capitula subject to manipulation were monitored until withering, after which cypselae were collected when ripe.</p>
        <p>The embryo vitality test (<abbrev xlink:title="The embryo vitality test">TTC</abbrev>) was carried out on seeds obtained through <abbrev xlink:title="spontaneous self-pollination">SS</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev> treatments to assess viability. In particular, we tested whether the morphological appearance of the cypselae was a reliable criterion for predicting viability. All cypselae produced within a capitulum were first attributed to distinct morphological classes: well developed and well-shaped, pale brown in colour (<abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev> – viable); small, shrunken, and dark coloured (<abbrev xlink:title="dark coloured">G3</abbrev>); intermediate forms (<abbrev xlink:title="intermediate forms">G2</abbrev>). According to preliminary observations, we expected that: <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev>-type cypselae would bear a vital embryo, <abbrev xlink:title="intermediate forms">G2</abbrev>-type would be empty or with an unviable embryo, <abbrev xlink:title="dark coloured">G3</abbrev>-type would always be sterile (without embryo). Following the experiment, morphological categories «viable» and «unviable» were later assigned to the classes.</p>
        <p>The <abbrev xlink:title="The embryo vitality test">TTC</abbrev> test was performed on a subset of seeds from each morphological class (20% of the total number of cypselae per capitulum, following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bacchetta et al. 2006</xref>), using 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride diluted to 1% in a 0.1 M solution of phosphate buffer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Van Waes and Debergh 1986</xref>). Before being immerged in <abbrev xlink:title="The embryo vitality test">TTC</abbrev> solution, the cypselae were scarified mechanically. Once divided according to morphological class, seeds were placed into a test tube with 6 ml of reagent, after which the tubes were put in a water bath at a constant temperature of 30 °C for 48 hours. Next, the tubes were extracted from the water bath, the <abbrev xlink:title="The embryo vitality test">TTC</abbrev> solution substituted with distilled water after which the tubes were placed into a fridge (at 4 °C). Embryo vitality was inspected under an optical microscope at a later stage.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Reproductive success under natural conditions" id="sec6">
        <title>Reproductive success under natural conditions</title>
        <p>To gather information on reproductive success and pollination efficiency, we performed a pollen supplementation experiment in <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev>. We marked 12 capitula chosen randomly, and left them unmanipulated (test <abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev> – natural pollination); in parallel, we selected 11 capitula and supplemented flowers with pollen collected from different individuals within the same population (test <abbrev xlink:title="intra-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-intra</abbrev> – intra-population xenogamous pollination). Pollen was collected from different plants, mainly from capitula with abundant exposed pollen. Pollen supplementation was repeated for three consecutive days, in order to pollinate all flowers of the inflorescence. A minimum distance of 5 meters between pollen donors and pollen receiving scapes was kept while performing the test <abbrev xlink:title="intra-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-intra</abbrev>, to limit the risk of intra-genet pollination. Using a clean paintbrush, pollen was applied to flowers exhibiting exposed stigmas. Experimental capitula were monitored until withering and fruiting and cypselae collected once ripened.</p>
        <p>To check for possible intra-population inbreeding depression, we performed an inter-population pollination test (<abbrev xlink:title="inter-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-inter</abbrev>) on 11 capitula. The scapes were marked and bagged at bud stage with non-woven fabric as protection against insects. Manipulations were performed as described for <abbrev xlink:title="intra-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-intra</abbrev>, but pollen donors were selected among individuals belonging to <abbrev xlink:title="reinforced">REI</abbrev>. To preserve pollen viability, donor capitula were kept in a Falcon tube and maintained in a cool bag during the transfer. Before performing hand pollination, bagged capitula were delicately shaken, to avoid (at least partially) issues deriving from stigma clogging, <italic>sensu</italic><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Kawagoe and Suzuki (2005)</xref>. As for the other experiments, capitula were monitored until withering and fruiting and mature cypselae were collected.</p>
        <p>Subsequently, germination ability of viable cypselae (<abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev>) produced under the different treatments was evaluated in the laboratory. Since no specific germination protocol of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">J.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is available, we adopted the procedure currently in use in Bologna University’s laboratory of agriculture for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">Jacobaea</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="maritima">maritima</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (L.) Pelser &amp; Meijden (<ext-link xlink:href="http://www.scienzeagrarie.unibo.it" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.scienzeagrarie.unibo.it</ext-link>). The test was carried out on fruits collected in 2017, set after the following tests: <abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev>, <abbrev xlink:title="hand self-pollination">HS</abbrev>, <abbrev xlink:title="spontaneous self-pollination">SS</abbrev>, <abbrev xlink:title="intra-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-intra</abbrev>, <abbrev xlink:title="inter-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-inter</abbrev>. A total of 15 visually well-developed fruits per capitulum were randomly chosen among those collected in the field. All <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev> cypselae produced by one capitulum were selected if less than 15 <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev> cypselae were available per capitulum. Sample sizes are shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>. Germination tests lasted a total of 21 days and were considered done when, after two consecutive inspections, no new radicles were visible.</p>
        <p>To minimise mould formation, all materials were sterilised using either an autoclave or an alcohol bath (e.g. plastic Petri dishes). Cypselae were surface-sterilised by immersion in 1% NaClO for 3 minutes, rinsed with deionised water for 10 minutes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Rossi et al. 2016</xref>), and stored at 4 °C for 5 days, to induce dormancy-breaking thermal shock. Afterwards, cypselae were placed on filter paper moistened with deionised water in Petri dishes and kept in phytotron (12 h light/dark, 20 °C). Filter paper moisture was checked daily, and germination was monitored every 2–3-days. Seeds were considered germinated when radicles were visible to the naked eye.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Statistical analyses" id="sec7">
        <title>Statistical analyses</title>
        <p>We performed <italic>χ</italic><sup>2</sup> tests by means of <italic>chisq.test</italic> function, with p-values adjusted using the Bonferroni correction. In particular, the first analysis involved testing to verify any difference in embryo vitality between <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev> cypselae and the sum of <abbrev xlink:title="intermediate forms">G2</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="dark coloured">G3</abbrev> cypselae (ratio <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev>/(<abbrev xlink:title="intermediate forms">G2</abbrev>+<abbrev xlink:title="dark coloured">G3</abbrev>)), basically viable/unviable cypselae. Next, we tested the ratio set after <abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev>, <abbrev xlink:title="spontaneous self-pollination">SS</abbrev>, <abbrev xlink:title="hand self-pollination">HS</abbrev>, <abbrev xlink:title="intra-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-intra</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="inter-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-inter</abbrev> tests, considering pairs of ecologically relevant comparisons. Finally, we compared <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev> cypselae germination rates with distinct pairs of tests, considering the numbers of germinated <italic>versus</italic> the number of ungerminated seeds (<italic>sensu lato</italic>, including <abbrev xlink:title="dark coloured">G3</abbrev> cypselae). All statistical elaborations were performed in RStudio version 4.0.2.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Data resources" id="sec8">
        <title>Data resources</title>
        <p>Data available from the Zenodo Digital Repository: <ext-link xlink:href="10.5281/zenodo.15461682" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15461682</ext-link>.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Results" id="sec9">
      <title>Results</title>
      <sec sec-type="Breeding system and selfing ability" id="sec10">
        <title>Breeding system and selfing ability</title>
        <p>The mean number of cypselae produced per capitulum in <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> is reported in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>.</p>
        <table-wrap id="T2" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Number of fruits (mean ± st.dev.) categorised per morphological aspect (<abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev>, <abbrev xlink:title="intermediate forms">G2</abbrev>, <abbrev xlink:title="dark coloured">G3</abbrev>, see main text for details) obtained from pollination tests (<abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev> = natural pollination, <abbrev xlink:title="spontaneous self-pollination">SS</abbrev> = spontaneous self-pollination, <abbrev xlink:title="hand self-pollination">HS</abbrev> = hand self-pollination) in the <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> population. Numbers in brackets represent sample sizes.</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="3">
                  <bold>Cypsela morphological classes</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Test</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev>
                  </bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <abbrev xlink:title="intermediate forms">G2</abbrev>
                  </bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <abbrev xlink:title="dark coloured">G3</abbrev>
                  </bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Mean percentage of vital <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev> embryo (<abbrev xlink:title="The embryo vitality test">TTC</abbrev>)</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">73.50 ± 7.65 (441)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">22.83 ± 7.23 (137)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">6.33 ± 3.12 (38)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">10.96 ± 3.83</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="spontaneous self-pollination">SS</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">- (0)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">7.33 ± 5.38 (44)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">72.33 ± 8.17 (434)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="hand self-pollination">HS</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">10.73 ± 3.19 (118)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">19.55 ± 6.10 (215)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">54.00 ± 8.41 (594)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Not available</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The highest number of <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev> cypselae was obtained after <abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev> treatment. <abbrev xlink:title="hand self-pollination">HS</abbrev> treatment mainly produced <abbrev xlink:title="intermediate forms">G2</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="dark coloured">G3</abbrev> cypselae, whereas <abbrev xlink:title="spontaneous self-pollination">SS</abbrev> treament produced only <abbrev xlink:title="intermediate forms">G2</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="dark coloured">G3</abbrev> cypselae.</p>
        <p>The <abbrev xlink:title="The embryo vitality test">TTC</abbrev> test confirmed that only <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev> cypselae carried a vital embryo, with highly significant differences in embryo vitality between <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="intermediate forms">G2</abbrev>+<abbrev xlink:title="dark coloured">G3</abbrev> (<italic>χ</italic><sup>2</sup> = 37.38, <italic>ν</italic> = 1, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001).</p>
        <p>The proportion of viable cypselae produced differed among treatments, resulting significantly higher in <abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev> compared to both <abbrev xlink:title="spontaneous self-pollination">SS</abbrev> (which set exclusively <abbrev xlink:title="intermediate forms">G2</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="dark coloured">G3</abbrev> types; <italic>χ</italic><sup>2</sup> = 570.34, <italic>ν</italic> = 1, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001) and <abbrev xlink:title="hand self-pollination">HS</abbrev> (<italic>χ</italic><sup>2</sup> = 552.44, <italic>ν</italic> = 1, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001). However, <abbrev xlink:title="hand self-pollination">HS</abbrev> produced significantly more <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev> cypselae compared to <abbrev xlink:title="spontaneous self-pollination">SS</abbrev> (<italic>χ</italic><sup>2</sup> = 64.78, <italic>ν</italic> = 1, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001), which produced none.</p>
        <p>Germination rates of <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev> cypselae obtained through <abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="hand self-pollination">HS</abbrev> were not significantly different (<italic>χ</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.325, <italic>ν</italic> = 1, <italic>P</italic> = 0.569).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Reproductive success under natural conditions" id="sec11">
        <title>Reproductive success under natural conditions</title>
        <p>The number of viable fruits produced in natural conditions (<abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev>) was significantly different in <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="reinforced">REI</abbrev> populations (<italic>χ</italic><sup>2</sup> = 15.51, <italic>ν</italic> = 1, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001), with more <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev> cypselae obtained in the former (74.56%) compared to the latter (65.81%). However, the germination of <abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev>-seeds was significantly higher for <abbrev xlink:title="reinforced">REI</abbrev>, than for <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> (<italic>χ</italic><sup>2</sup> = 166.68, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001).</p>
        <p>The number of <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev> cypselae per capitulum did not significantly differ (<italic>χ</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.725, <italic>ν</italic> = 1, <italic>P</italic> = 0.395) between <abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev> (60.56%) and <abbrev xlink:title="intra-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-intra</abbrev> treatments (72.44%). Equally, no statistical difference was found for germination rates of <abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="intra-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-intra</abbrev> seeds (<italic>χ</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.170, <italic>P</italic> = 0.680). The number of <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev> cypselae obtained through <abbrev xlink:title="intra-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-intra</abbrev> was significantly higher than the one obtained through <abbrev xlink:title="inter-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-inter</abbrev> (<italic>χ</italic><sup>2</sup> = 65.67, <italic>ν</italic> = 1, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001). However, seeds produced through <abbrev xlink:title="inter-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-inter</abbrev> showed significantly greater germination rates than those produced through <abbrev xlink:title="intra-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-intra</abbrev> (<italic>χ</italic><sup>2</sup> = 4.821, <italic>P</italic> = 0.028). All ecologically relevant pairwise comparisons and the results of the <italic>χ</italic><sup>2</sup> goodness of fit tests are summarised in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>.</p>
        <table-wrap id="T3" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 3.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Ecologically relevant pairwise comparisons of the reproductive output (ratio between <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="intermediate forms">G2</abbrev>+<abbrev xlink:title="dark coloured">G3</abbrev> cypselae, and seed germination rates); <italic>ν</italic> = 1. <abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev> = natural pollination, <abbrev xlink:title="intra-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-intra</abbrev> = intra-population xenogamous pollination, <abbrev xlink:title="inter-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-inter</abbrev> = inter-population xenogamous pollination, <abbrev xlink:title="reinforced">REI</abbrev> = reinforced, <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> = natural. From a reproduction viewpoint, the meaning of the contrasts can be explained as follows: <abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev><abbrev xlink:title="reinforced">REI</abbrev> : <abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev><abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> - Comparing the natural reproductive outcome of <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> with that of a population subjected to a previous reinforcement intervention; <abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev><abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> : <abbrev xlink:title="intra-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-intra</abbrev><abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> - Comparing the natural reproductive outcome of <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> with that of capitula subjected to hand pollen supplementation; <abbrev xlink:title="intra-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-intra</abbrev><abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> : <abbrev xlink:title="inter-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-inter</abbrev> with <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> as pollen recipient - Comparing the reproductive outcome of <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> when supplemented with pollen from the same population vs. pollen taken from another population.</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Contrast</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Parameter</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Sample size</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>χ</italic>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>2</sup>
                  </bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <italic>P</italic>
                  </bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Mean values</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2" colspan="1"><abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev><abbrev xlink:title="reinforced">REI</abbrev> : <abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev><abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev></td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev>/(<abbrev xlink:title="intermediate forms">G2</abbrev>+<abbrev xlink:title="dark coloured">G3</abbrev>)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">738 : 384 vs. 545 : 186</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">15.51</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">&lt; 0.001</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.92 vs. 2.93</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Germination rates of <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev></td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">135/180 vs. 2/135</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">166.68</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">&lt; 0.001</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">75.00% vs. 1.48%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2" colspan="1"><abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev><abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> : <abbrev xlink:title="intra-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-intra</abbrev><abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev></td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev>/(<abbrev xlink:title="intermediate forms">G2</abbrev>+<abbrev xlink:title="dark coloured">G3</abbrev>)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">545 : 186 vs. 652 : 200</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.73</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.395</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.93 vs. 3.26</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Germination rates of <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev></td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2/135 vs. 4/135</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.17</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.680</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.48% vs. 2.96%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2" colspan="1"><abbrev xlink:title="intra-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-intra</abbrev><abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> : <abbrev xlink:title="inter-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-inter</abbrev> with <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev> as pollen receiver</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev>/(<abbrev xlink:title="intermediate forms">G2</abbrev>+<abbrev xlink:title="dark coloured">G3</abbrev>)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">652 : 200 vs. 547 : 380</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">65.67</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">&lt; 0.001</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.26 vs. 1.44</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Germination rates of <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev></td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4/135 vs. 14/135</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.82</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.028</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.96% vs. 10.37%</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Discussion" id="sec12">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>In this study, we investigated the breeding system and reproductive efficiency of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">Jacobaea</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in the Po Valley (Italy), in a context of progressive habitat loss (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Dallai et al. 2015</xref>). Even though the study focused on a single population, our results highlight intrinsic limitations in reproductive performance that are directly relevant to population vulnerability and of conservation interest.</p>
      <p>Our results reveal clear constraints on sexual reproduction and generation turnover, which are key components of vulnerability, even in relatively large and apparently stable populations. To begin, the external appearance of the fruit was consistently correlated with embryo vitality, providing a reliable, practical indicator within the populations of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">J.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> we investigated. In fact, results from the <abbrev xlink:title="The embryo vitality test">TTC</abbrev> test showed that only the apparently swollen cypselae (<abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev>-type) contained a vital embryo. Among <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Asteraceae">Asteraceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, the production of aborted seeds or no seeds at all is often related to small population size, inbreeding depression or pollination failure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Luijten et al. 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Mattana et al. 2012</xref> and references therein). Contrary to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Palmer (2006)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Winter et al. (2008)</xref>, who regard the taxon as a non-obligate entomophilous or even apomictic, we found that the presence of an insect pollen vector is essential for setting vital seeds. All seeds collected from capitula subjected to <abbrev xlink:title="spontaneous self-pollination">SS</abbrev> test were in fact either empty or (more rarely) carried unvital embryos, whereas hand self-pollinated capitula produced <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev> cypselae. Altogether, these results suggest that the species is self-compatible, but is rather significantly dependant on insect-mediated pollination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Palmer 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Stroh 2020</xref>).</p>
      <p>The pollen supplementation experiment revealed that pollination was not limited, even though the proportion of viable cypselae appeared greater (but not statistically different) for manually pollen-supplemented capitula. On average, the number of <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev> cypselae produced per capitulum by <abbrev xlink:title="intra-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-intra</abbrev> and natural pollination (<abbrev xlink:title="natural pollination">NP</abbrev>) was not so different (72.44 and 60.56, respectively); nonetheless, overall germination rates of both tests were alarming, indicating a severe limitation in effective recruitment despite adequate fruit production. This result appears similar to that obtained in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lamyropsis">Lamyropsis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="microcephala">microcephala</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Moris) Dittrich &amp; Greuter, which is endemic to Sardinia, characterised by small and isolated populations and with notoriously low seed production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Diana Corrias 1977</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Mattana et al. 2012</xref>).</p>
      <p>The germination rate of <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev> cypselae obtained in <abbrev xlink:title="reinforced">REI</abbrev> through natural pollination revealed a germination rate of 75% (against a value of 1.48% found in <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev>, not subject to any reinforcement), suggesting that the reinforcement carried out in 2006 was successful in enhancing the recipient population’s sexual reproduction. However, since individuals used for reinforcing came from the same population, therefore the increase in genetic variability could be scarce or even close to zero, these results must be interpreted carefully, seeing as for <abbrev xlink:title="reinforced">REI</abbrev> no reproduction studies were carried out prior to 2006.</p>
      <p>Unexpectedly, cross pollination between populations resulted in a significantly lower <abbrev xlink:title="pale brown in colour">G1</abbrev>/(<abbrev xlink:title="intermediate forms">G2</abbrev>+<abbrev xlink:title="dark coloured">G3</abbrev>) ratio, possibly reflecting outbreeding depression; however, the overall germination rate of <abbrev xlink:title="inter-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-inter</abbrev> was significantly higher than that of <abbrev xlink:title="intra-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-intra</abbrev>. In fact, seeds deriving from <abbrev xlink:title="inter-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-inter</abbrev> showed a germination rate of 10.37%, whilst those deriving from <abbrev xlink:title="intra-population xenogamous pollination">Xe-intra</abbrev> (within <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev>) did not exceed 2.96%. Such a result, where cross-pollination within the same population (<abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev>) leads to low reproductive success, could be explained following two alternative scenarios: <italic>a</italic>) vegetative propagation determines a short-range colonisation of the same maternal genotype; <italic>b</italic>) pollen vitality and/or fertility is scarce within the studied population. But previous unpublished results on pollen viability seem to rule out the latter hypothesis (on average, pollen vitality was never below 50%), whereas it has been documented that the species reproduces mainly vegetatively through fragmentation of the rhizome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Michna 2006</xref>), which bears buds that remain vital for years even if buried in the ground (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Ott et al. 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Stroh 2020</xref>). Therefore, low seed germination rates following xenogamous pollination may be due to some sort of post-zygotic barriers, which do not hinder embryo development but prevent vitality. Such barriers probably arise due to a high degree of kinship, suggesting the presence of inbreeding depression. Overall, our results highlight that significant constraints to generation turnover may occur even in relatively large populations and should not be interpreted necessarily as a consequence of the geographic marginality. In fact, even if small populations can experience fecundity reduction in insect-pollinated species (see e.g. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Tephroseris">Tephroseris</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="integrifolia">integrifolia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (L.) Holub – <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Widén 1993</xref>, sub <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Senecio">Senecio</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="integrifolius">integrifolius</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (L.) Clairv.), this is not the case of <abbrev xlink:title="natural">NAT</abbrev>, which is formed by several hundreds of flowering scapes. Therefore, given also its predominantly vegetative reproduction, the presence of some large populations of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">Jacobaea</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and it being rather widespread in some regions in northern Italy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Buldrini 2012</xref>) are not enough to assure the species’ survival over time, as already seen for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Marsilea">Marsilea</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="quadrifolia">quadrifolia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> L. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bonafede et al. 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Dallai et al. 2015</xref>), which lives in environments similar to those of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">J.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>.</p>
      <p>Overall, our findings indicate that limitations in seed viability and germination are a major bottleneck for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">J.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> population persistence, and that population size alone is not a reliable indicator of long-term viability.</p>
      <sec sec-type="Implications for conservation" id="sec13">
        <title>Implications for conservation</title>
        <p>The evidence gathered in this study from two peripheral populations of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">J.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> provides useful indications for conservation actions in lowland ecosystems.</p>
        <p>Italian populations of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">J.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> are fragmented and isolated, likely characterised by a low genetic diversity, as it often happens in populations located at the range limits (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Paul et al. 2016</xref>). Such populations, other than being isolated from one another, are separated from central European ones by the Alps (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Conti et al. 2005</xref>). Studies carried out on <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">Jacobaea</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="vulgaris">vulgaris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Gaertn. reported that seed dispersal occurs within 15 m from the mother plant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">McEvoy and Cox 1987</xref>), thus making spontaneous reinforcement of Po Plain populations from beyond the Alps very unlikely.</p>
        <p>Altogether, our results indicate that the reinforcement intervention performed in 2006 was successful. Regarding the study population, however, a similar intervention may not be sufficient. In fact, seed germination ability in this population is extremely low, indicating that a similar approach would likely be effective using material sourced from a distinct population. In addition, this intervention alone may not be enough to prevent population loss if nothing is done to maintain the original habitat of hydro-hygrophilous species. In fact, if <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">J.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> typically grows on unstable floodplains, subject to alternating phases of erosion and deposition, which create and destroy new habitats continuously, what remains of the species in wetlands and marshes would be guaranteed by maintaining traditional management involving harvesting, grazing, fires and alteration of grass cover, imitating natural processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Michna 2006</xref>). This kind of management is becoming rarer nowadays. Furthermore, the decline of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Jacobaea">J.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="paludosa">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is due not only to the ever-increasing deterioration of wetland areas, but also to the lack of regeneration niches in its natural habitat (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Diekmann and Bartels 2012</xref>). Therefore, alongside with targeted conservation measures, the implementation of policies aimed at preserving and restoring wetland habitats are of fundamental importance.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>We wish to thank everyone involved in this research: Elisabetta Sgarbi and Daniele Dallai (Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia), Maria Luisa Borettini, Claudio Magnani and all the Guardie Giurate Ecologiche Volontarie of the province of Reggio Emilia (who manage the SCI IT4030015) for allowing us to carry out the field activities in Novellara), Mariacristina Virgili (Ente Parco del Mincio) for allowing us to carry out the field activities in Piuda, Lorenzo Tosatti (English mother tongue teacher at English Language Services, Modena) for revising the original English text. In addition, we wish to thank the anonymous reviewers who helped us in thoroughly improving the first version of this manuscript.</p>
    </ack>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <mixed-citation>Aronne G (2017) Identification of bottlenecks in the plant life cycle for sustainable conservation of rare and endangered species. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 5: 76. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3389/fevo.2017.00076" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00076</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <mixed-citation>Bacchetta G, Belletti P, Brullo S, Cagelli L, Carasso V, Casas JL, Cervelli C, Escribà MC, Fenu G, Gorian F, Güemes J, Mattana E, Nepi M, Pacini E, Pavone P, Piotto B, Pontecorvo C, Prada A, Venora G, Vietto L, Virevaire M (2006) Manuale per la raccolta, studio, conservazione e gestione <italic>ex situ</italic> del germoplasma. APAT, Dipartimento Difesa della Natura, Servizio Parchi e risorse naturali, Roma.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <mixed-citation>Bonafede F, Dallai D, Maffettone L, Del Prete C (2003) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Marsilea</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">quadrifolia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> L. in Emilia-Romagna: distribuzione, ecologia e problematiche di conservazione integrata <italic>in situ/ex situ</italic>. Atti della Società dei Naturalisti e Matematici di Modena 133: 183–211. <ext-link xlink:href="10.69081/ASNMM.2002.183" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.69081/ASNMM.2002.183</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <mixed-citation>Buffa G, Carpenè B, Casarotto N, Da Pozzo M, Filesi L, Lasen C, Marcucci R, Masin R, Prosser F, Tasinazzo S, Villani M, Zanatta K (2016) Lista rossa regionale delle piante vascolari. Regione del Veneto, Venezia.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <mixed-citation>Buldrini F (2012) Rarità periferica e dimensioni delle popolazioni: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Viola</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">pumila</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Viola</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">elatior</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> e <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Jacobaea</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> nella pianura padana. PhD dissertation, Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra - Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <mixed-citation>Buldrini F, Conte L, Dallai D, Ferrari C (2013a) Genetic diversity of the rare and endangered meadow violet (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Viola</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">pumila</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Chaix) at the southern margin of its range. Plant Biosystems 147(3): 563–572. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/11263504.2012.754383" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2012.754383</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <mixed-citation>Buldrini F, Dallai D, Adorni M, Bona E, Bonali F, Castello M, Costalonga S, Pellegrino G, Picco F, Polani F, Santini C, Selvaggi A, Tasinazzo S, Vidali M, Zanotti E (2013b) Schede per una Lista rossa della Flora vascolare e crittogamica italiana: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Viola</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">elatior</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Fries. Informatore Botanico Italiano 45(1): 181–186.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <mixed-citation>Buldrini F, Dallai D, Torri P (2013c) Can palynology contribute to plant diversity conservation activities? The wetland plants in southern Po plain as a case study. Annali di Botanica (Roma) 3: 245–254. <ext-link xlink:href="https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa04/annali_di_botanica/article/view/10293" ext-link-type="uri">https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa04/annali_di_botanica/article/view/10293</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <mixed-citation>Burkart M (2001) River corridor plants (Stromtalpflanzen) in Central European lowland: a review of a poorly understood plant distribution pattern. Global Ecology and Biogeography 10: 449–468. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1046/j.1466-822x.2001.00270.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822x.2001.00270.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <mixed-citation>Calvo J, Álvarez I, Aedo C (2015) Systematics of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Senecio</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> section <italic>Crociseris</italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Compositae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe">Senecioneae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Phytotaxa 211(1): 1–105. <ext-link xlink:href="10.11646/phytotaxa.211.1.1" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.211.1.1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <mixed-citation>Conti F, Abbate G, Alessandrini A, Blasi C (2005) An Annotated Checklist of the Italian Vascular Flora. Palombi Editori, Roma.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <mixed-citation>Conti F, Manzi A, Pedrotti F (1992) Libro Rosso delle Piante d’Italia. Associazione Italiana per il World Wildlife Fund, Ministero dell’Ambiente - Direzione Generale per la Valutazione dell’Impatto Ambientale, Roma.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <mixed-citation>Conti F, Manzi A, Pedrotti F (1997) Liste rosse regionali delle Piante d’Italia. Associazione italiana per il WWF e Società Botanica Italiana, Camerino.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <mixed-citation>Dallai D, Buldrini F, Conte L, Ferrari C, Fanti E, Fornasiero E, Tonelli F, Zampighi C, Negrini F (2011) Gestione della rete idrologica e conservazione della biodiversità vegetale in un territorio di bonifica (Bonifica Burana, Emilia orientale). Bollettino dei Musei e degli Istituti Biologici dell’Università di Genova 73: 154.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <mixed-citation>Dallai D, Buldrini F, Santini C, Fanti E, Tonelli F, Zampighi C (2015) Aspetti di tutela della flora idro-igrofila nei canali della Bonifica Burana. Atti della Società dei Naturalisti e Matematici di Modena 146: 207–232. <ext-link xlink:href="10.69081/ASNMM.2015.207" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.69081/ASNMM.2015.207</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <mixed-citation>Dallai D, Del Prete C, Sgarbi E, Grimaudo M (2010) Integrated <italic>in situ/ex situ</italic> plant conservation practices managed by University Botanic Garden of Modena. Bollettino dei Musei e degli Istituti Biologici dell’Università di Genova 72: 33–42.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <mixed-citation>Danihelka J, Niklfeld H, Šípošová H (2009) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Viola</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">elatior</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Viola</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">pumila</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Viola</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">stagnina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in Austria, Czechia and Slovakia: a story of decline. Preslia 81(2): 151–171.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <mixed-citation>Diana Corrias S (1977) Le piante endemiche della Sardegna: 6–7. Bollettino della Società Sarda di Scienze Naturali 16: 287–294.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <mixed-citation>Diekmann M, Bartels M (2012) Das Sumpf-Greiskraut (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Senecio</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">paludosus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) in Deutschland - Ökologie und Vergesellschaftung. Tuexenia 32: 105–118.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <mixed-citation>Dorotovičová C (2013) Man-made canals as a hotspot of aquatic macrophyte biodiversity in Slovakia. Limnologica 43: 277–287. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.limno.2012.12.002" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2012.12.002</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <mixed-citation>IPBES (2019) Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES secretariat, Bonn. <ext-link xlink:href="10.5281/zenodo.3831673" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <mixed-citation>IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <mixed-citation>IUCN/SSC (2013) Guidelines for reintroductions and other conservation translocations. Version 1.0. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN Species Survival Commission.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <mixed-citation>Kawagoe T, Suzuki N (2005) Self‐pollen on a stigma interferes with outcrossed seed production in a self‐incompatible monoecious plant, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Akebia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">quinata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Lardizabalaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Functional Ecology 19(1): 49–54. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.0269-8463.2005.00950.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0269-8463.2005.00950.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <mixed-citation>Klotz S, Kühn I, Durka W (2002) BIOLFLOR – Eine Datenbank mit biologisch-ökologischen Merkmalen der Gefäßpflanzen in Deutschland. Version 1.1. Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde 38. Bonn.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <mixed-citation>Liu FH, Liu J, Dong M (2016) Ecological consequences of clonal integration in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 770. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3389/fpls.2016.00770" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00770</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <mixed-citation>Luijten SH, Oostermeijer JGB, van Leeuwen NC, den Nijs HCM (1996) Reproductive success and clonal genetic structure of the rare <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Arnica</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">montana</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Compositae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) in The Netherlands. Plant Systematics and Evolution 201: 15–30. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/BF00989049" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989049</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <mixed-citation>Mattana E, Fenu G, Bacchetta G (2012) Seed production and <italic>in situ</italic> germination of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Lamyropsis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">microcephala</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Asteraceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), a threatened Mediterranean mountain species. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 44(3): 343–349. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1657/1938-4246-44.3.343" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-44.3.343</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <mixed-citation>McEvoy PB, Cox CS (1987) Wind dispersal distances in dimorphic achenes of ragwort, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Senecio</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">jacobaea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Ecology 68(6): 2006–2015. <ext-link xlink:href="10.2307/1939891" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2307/1939891</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <mixed-citation>Metzing D, Garve E, Matzke-Hajek G (2018) Rote Liste und Gesamtartenliste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="phylum">Trachaeophyta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) Deutschlands. In: Metzing D, Hofbauer N, Ludwig G, Matzke-Hajek G (eds) Rote Liste der gefährdeten Tiere, Pflanzen und Pilze Deutschlands. Band 7: Pflanzen. Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt 70(7): 13–358.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <mixed-citation>Michna P (2006) 552. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Senecio</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">paludosus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Compositae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. Curtis’s Botanical Magazine 23(1): 69–76. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1355-4905.2006.00516.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1355-4905.2006.00516.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <mixed-citation>Montanari I, Buldrini F, Bolpagni R, Laini A, Dalla Vecchia A, De Bernardini N, Campione L, Castellari I, Gizzi G, Landi S, Chiarucci A (2020) Role of irrigation canal morphology in driving riparian flora in over-exploited catchments. Community Ecology 21(2): 121–132. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s42974-020-00024-5" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s42974-020-00024-5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <mixed-citation>Montanari I, De Bernardini N, Gizzi G, Bolpagni R, Buldrini F, Campione L, Castellari I, Landi S, Spiezia L, Chiarucci A (2022) Flora and plant communities across a complex network of heavily modified water bodies: geographical patterns, land use and hydrochemical drivers in a temperate overexploited floodplain. Landscape and Ecological Engineering 18(3): 367–380. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s11355-022-00504-y" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-022-00504-y</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <mixed-citation>Ott JP, Klimešová J, Hartnett DC (2019) The ecology and significance of below-ground bud banks in plants. Annals of Botany 123(7): 1099–1118. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/aob/mcz051" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcz051</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <mixed-citation>Palmer MA (2006) Fen Ragwort <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Senecio</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">paludosus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> L.: a review of conservation work carried out under English Nature’s Species Recovery Programme, 1991 to 2005. English Nature Research Reports 674: 11–31.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <mixed-citation>Paul W, Cieślak E, Ronikier M, Migdałek G, Słomka A, Żabicka J (2016) Low genetic diversity of declining <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Viola</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">uliginosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Violaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) at its southern range limits in Poland. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia, Series Botanica 58(2): 71–82. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1515/abcsb-2016-0015" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1515/abcsb-2016-0015</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <mixed-citation>Persico G (2009) Guida alla Flora del Mincio e del territorio circostante. Parco del Mincio, Sistema Bibliotecario Grande Mantova. Zapparoli Print &amp; Communications, Pegognaga.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <mixed-citation>Pignatti S, Guarino R, La Rosa M (2017–2019) Flora d’Italia, II ed. Edagricole di New Business Media, Milano.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <mixed-citation>Poldini L, Oriolo G, Vidali M (2001) Vascular Flora of Friuli-Venezia Giulia. An annotated catalogue and synonimic index. Studia Geobotanica 21: 3–227.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <mixed-citation>Portal to the Flora of Italy (2025) Portale della Flora d’Italia/Portal to the Flora of Italy 2025.1. <ext-link xlink:href="https://dryades.units.it/floritaly/" ext-link-type="uri">https://dryades.units.it/floritaly/</ext-link> [Accessed 23.11.2025]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <mixed-citation>Prosser F (2001) Lista Rossa della Flora del Trentino. Pteridofite e Fanerogame. Museo Civico di Rovereto, Edizioni Osiride, Rovereto.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <mixed-citation>Rossi M, Fisogni A, Galloni M (2016) The effect of pollination mode on seed performance of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Gentiana</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">lutea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>: a laboratory evaluation of seed germinability. Nordic Journal of Botany 34: 761–768. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/njb.01177" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.01177</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B43">
        <mixed-citation>Stroh P (2020) An update on the history, ecology and fate of Fen Ragwort (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Jacobaea</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">paludosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) in Britain. Nature in Cambridgeshire 62: 39–45.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B44">
        <mixed-citation>Van Waes JM, Debergh PC (1986) Adaptation of the tetrazolium method for the seed viability, and scanning electron microscopy study of some Western European orchids. Physiologia Plantarum 66: 435–442. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1399-3054.1986.tb05947.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1986.tb05947.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B45">
        <mixed-citation>Walters SM (1974) The rediscovery of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Senecio</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">paludosus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> L. in Britain. Watsonia 10(1): 49–54.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B46">
        <mixed-citation>Wärner C, Welk E, Durka W, Wittig B, Diekmann M (2011) Biological Flora of Central Europe: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Euphorbia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">palustris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> L. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 13(1): 55–69. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ppees.2011.02.001" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2011.02.001</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B47">
        <mixed-citation>Wells TCE, Preston CD, Cox R, Croft JM, Frost A (1994) Species Recovery Programme, Fen Ragwort (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Senecio</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">paludosus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> L.) and Ribbon-leaved Water-plantain (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Alisma</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">gramineum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Lej.). Unpublished Final Report. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology on behalf of English Nature/NERC.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B48">
        <mixed-citation>Wells TCE, Preston CD, Cox R, Croft JM, Frost A, Barratt D (1993) Species Recovery Programme, Fen Ragwort (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Senecio</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">paludosus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> L.) and Ribbon-leaved Water-plantain (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Alisma</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">gramineum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Lej.). Unpublished 2<sup>nd</sup> Progress Report. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology on behalf of English Nature/NERC.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B49">
        <mixed-citation>Widén B (1993) Demographic and genetic effects on reproduction as related to population size in a rare, perennial herb, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Senecio</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">integrifolius</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Asteraceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society of London 50: 179–195. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1006/bijl.1993.1053" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1006/bijl.1993.1053</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B50">
        <mixed-citation>Winter C, Lehmann S, Diekmann M (2008) Determinants of reproductive success: A comparative study of five endangered river corridor plants in fragmented habitats. Biological Conservation 141: 1095–1104. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.biocon.2008.02.002" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.02.002</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B51">
        <mixed-citation>Zacharias D, Garve E (1996) Verbreitung und Häufigkeit von Stromtalpflanzen im ehemaligen Amt Neuhaus (Mittelelbe, Lkr. Lüneburg). Braunschweiger Geobotanische Arbeiten 4: 35–58.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B52">
        <mixed-citation>Zàngheri P (1976) Flora Italica. CEDAM, Padova.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
    <fn-group>
      <fn id="FN">
        <p>Marta Barberis and Fabrizio Buldrini contributed equally to this work.</p>
      </fn>
    </fn-group>
    <sec sec-type="supplementary-material">
      <title>Supplementary materials</title>
      <supplementary-material id="S1" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/italianbotanist.22.183002.suppl1</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">67C569FB-CECD-5E57-AE0E-ADD73461A888</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 1</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Supplementary information</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>docx</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="italianbotanist-22-001-s001.docx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1715946.docx">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1715946</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Marta Barberis, Fabrizio Buldrini, Gherardo Bogo, Riccardo Severi, Marta Galloni</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
    </sec>
  </back>
</article>
